Nintendo's recent patent approval covers a gameplay mechanic involving summoning a sub-character for battles, sparking significant implications for other monster battling games. This patent was awarded amid an ongoing lawsuit with Pocketpair, the developer of Palworld, which features similar mechanics. The patent can potentially impact various games from rival franchises like Digimon and upcoming titles such as Honkai: Nexus Anima and DokeV, as well as indie games like Temtem. Given the patent's broad terms, there are concerns about its enforceability and its implications for developer creativity in the industry.
nIs Nintendo's monster battling patent enforceable against other game developers?While Nintendo's patent is now granted and enforceable in theory, industry experts suggest it might be ignored by other developers, who could potentially leverage prior art to counter any legal action. The uncertainty surrounding enforcement highlights a need for reform in how video game patents are evaluated.
nThe upcoming Pokémon Legends: Z-A is set to release on October 16, 2025, intensifying the spotlight on Nintendo and its new patent strategy. This title is a continuation of the beloved Pokémon franchise and is anticipated to explore new gameplay mechanics, potentially influenced by this patent case.
Jordan Keats
Jordan Keats is a former professional gamer turned journalist, whose competitive background gives them a unique perspective on esports and multiplayer games. Jordan's expertise in strategy and game mechanics is unmatched, offering readers a deeper understing.
Read more articles from Jordan Keats
Comments
Honestly, this patent situation feels like Nintendo trying to copyright the idea of having a friend in a fight—it’s a bold move, but I doubt it’ll stick. Still, it’s wild to see how much this could shake up the vibe for smaller devs trying to innovate in the monster-battling space.
Man, Nintendo's really flexing their legal muscles with this patent, but it feels like they're trying to trademark the concept of having a sidekick in a game. I'm curious to see if this actually holds up in court or just ends up being a bunch of legal posturing.