Daniel Vavra, co-founder of Warhorse Studios and the lead writer behind the acclaimed RPGs Kingdom Come: Deliverance and its sequel, has offered his take on The Outer Worlds 2, giving it a score of 7/10. While he acknowledged this as a decent rating, Vavra criticized Obsidian Entertainment for lacking innovation in their RPG design, questioning the addition of new game mechanics despite the financial and technological support from Microsoft. His comments sparked discussions around the game's Flaw system, which some players enjoy for its impact on gameplay, but Vavra dismisses it as uninspired. He expressed disappointment in the game's failure to create a more dynamic and living world, challenging Obsidian to push beyond traditional RPG formulas. Vavra's review sheds light on the ongoing debate over what constitutes evolution in modern gaming.

What are the criticisms of The Outer Worlds 2 by Daniel Vavra?

Daniel Vavra criticized The Outer Worlds 2 for lacking innovation and new game mechanics, stating that it did not evolve beyond the foundational aspects seen in previous RPGs like Fallout and Deus Ex. He expressed a desire for a more living, simulated world with true non-linearity and innovative gameplay.

The Outer Worlds 2 is a sequel to the beloved 2019 RPG from Obsidian Entertainment, known for its humor, character-driven storytelling, and vibrant sci-fi universe. Building on the success of its predecessor, it incorporates fresh elements like the Flaw system, which rewards players with unique perks while imposing challenges based on their gameplay style. This balance has garnered attention, even as debates continue regarding its innovation—and whether it meets the high expectations set by titles like Fallout: New Vegas.