
Ace Attorney Developer Reacts to AI's Mixed Game Results
Apr 22, 2025 11:17 AMRecent research utilized the classic game Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney to assess the capabilities of various AI models in memory, reasoning, and strategic decision-making. While the AI models were unable to complete the game, two models, Google Gemini and OpenAI's o1, performed relatively well, reaching the penultimate episode. Developer Masakazu Sugimori expressed surprise at the game's use in AI testing, given its challenging design aimed at encouraging human deductive capabilities.
Can AI beat Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney?No, current AI models have not succeeded in beating Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney, with none completing the game as of now. The test highlighted the intricacies involved in human reasoning that the AI models struggled to replicate.
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney is a beloved visual novel and adventure game released by Capcom. It first launched in 2001, and the gameplay revolves around courtroom trials where players must gather evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and solve compelling cases. The series has gained a massive following, spawning several sequels and adaptations, such as films and stage productions. Its unique blend of storytelling, humor, and challenging puzzles has solidified its place in gaming history.

Casey Loh
Casey Loh is a tech-savvy writer who specializes in the intersection of gaming and technology. With a background in computer science, Casey brings a technical lens to her reviews, breaking down the nuts and bolts of game engines, graphics, and AI innovation.
Follow us
Fans
Fans
Fans

Guess even AI can't handle the pressure of Phoenix Wright's 'Objection' moments—human intuition still wins this case. Though Gemini and o1 putting up a decent fight gives me hope for future AI co-op trials (Keeps it lighthearted, nods to the game's iconic mechanic, and adds a fun speculative twist.)

Interesting to see AI stumble over Phoenix Wright's courtroom drama—turns out bluffing and dramatic objections are harder to code than we thought. Still, props to Gemini and o1 for getting further than I did on my first playthrough (Keeps it casual, references the game's tone, and adds a playful personal touch without rehashing the article's details.)